- TESIGN / RADAR
- COMPARE
- OpenMouse vs Ruffle
OpenMouse vs Ruffle
Two tools side by side on stored numbers and facts. No verdict of ours: every number (stars, gains, last commit, contributors) carries the time it was checked, licence and platform are copied from each entry, and a missing value reads [unconfirmed].
AI chooses the lists under the owner’s delegation. No human review is running in September 2026. Total stars, increases, cross-source signals, last updates and licences are shown as evidence. How ranks work →
| FACT | OpenMouse | Ruffle |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,779checked on GitHub | ★ 18,787checked on GitHub |
| 7-day gain | no data | no data |
| 30-day gain | no data | no data |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0Release source if you redistribute or host it as a service. | Licence unconfirmedUnconfirmed — check before use. |
| Platform | web | web · windows · macos · linux |
| Last commit | 1 day ago · | within 24 h · |
| Contributors | 55 contributors | 240 contributors |
| How to start | Use in the browser | Use in the browser |
Star totals are the last GitHub check plus increases observed via GH Archive since; the 7- and 30-day gains are GH Archive observations to the reference time. The same snapshot as the rankings — a comparison, not a recommendation.
WHICH FOR WHOM
The roles are copied from each entry’s "who uses it" lines. Nothing here is a new judgement.
- OpenMouse
- Gamers with mice from several brands · Linux users · Developers reverse-engineering mouse protocols
- Ruffle
- Anyone with old Flash teaching material or promos to revive, and people who want to play the games again.