TESIGN / RADAR
COMPARE
open-code-review vs Paperweight

open-code-review vs Paperweight

Two tools side by side on stored numbers and facts. No verdict of ours: every number (stars, gains, last commit, contributors) carries the time it was checked, licence and platform are copied from each entry, and a missing value reads [unconfirmed].

Both in SECURITY →

As of 11-01 21:00 UTC

AI chooses the lists under the owner’s delegation. No human review is running in September 2026. Total stars, increases, cross-source signals, last updates and licences are shown as evidence. How ranks work →

open-code-review

AI code review for developers

Paperweight

Map your digital footprint from email

FACT	open-code-review	Paperweight
GitHub stars	★ 49,245checked on GitHub 11-02 02:16 UTC	★ 550checked on GitHub 11-02 02:15 UTC
7-day gain	no data	no data
30-day gain	no data	no data
Licence	Apache-2.0Commercial use, redistribution OK. Keep notices; mark changes.	MITUse, change and redistribute, commercially too. Keep the notice.
Platform	windows · macos · linux · cli	windows · macos · linux
Last commit	2026-11-01within 24 h · As of 11-02 02:16 UTC	2026-10-2210 days ago · As of 11-02 02:15 UTC
Contributors	204 contributorsAs of 11-02 02:16 UTC	6 contributorsAs of 11-02 02:15 UTC
How to start	[unconfirmed]	Install to use

Star totals are the last GitHub check plus increases observed via GH Archive since; the 7- and 30-day gains are GH Archive observations to the reference time. The same snapshot as the rankings — a comparison, not a recommendation. As of 11-01 21:00 UTC

WHICH FOR WHOM

The roles are copied from each entry’s "who uses it" lines. Nothing here is a new judgement.

open-code-review: Team lead · Security owner · Solo developer
Paperweight: Anyone who wants to clean up old sign-ups and marketing mail.

More on open-code-review →More on Paperweight →

← All comparisons