- TESIGN / RADAR
- COMPARE
- open-code-review vs OpenHunterAI
open-code-review vs OpenHunterAI
Two tools side by side on stored numbers and facts. No verdict of ours: every number (stars, gains, last commit, contributors) carries the time it was checked, licence and platform are copied from each entry, and a missing value reads [unconfirmed].
AI chooses the lists under the owner’s delegation. No human review is running in September 2026. Total stars, increases, cross-source signals, last updates and licences are shown as evidence. How ranks work →
open-code-review
AI code review for developersOpenHunterAI
Local AI red-team workspace| FACT | open-code-review | OpenHunterAI |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 49,245checked on GitHub | ★ 335checked on GitHub |
| 7-day gain | no data | no data |
| 30-day gain | no data | no data |
| Licence | Apache-2.0Commercial use, redistribution OK. Keep notices; mark changes. | Licence unconfirmedUnconfirmed — check before use. |
| Platform | windows · macos · linux · cli | web · cli |
| Last commit | within 24 h · | 9 days ago · |
| Contributors | 204 contributors | 5 contributors |
| How to start | [unconfirmed] | Self-host |
Star totals are the last GitHub check plus increases observed via GH Archive since; the 7- and 30-day gains are GH Archive observations to the reference time. The same snapshot as the rankings — a comparison, not a recommendation.
WHICH FOR WHOM
The roles are copied from each entry’s "who uses it" lines. Nothing here is a new judgement.
- open-code-review
- Team lead · Security owner · Solo developer
- OpenHunterAI
- A small team that wants to regularly check its own service's security · A developer who wants a coding agent to run approval-gated security checks · Anyone who wants hands-on practice with recon tooling, strictly on authorized targets