TESIGN
SAVED

EN · KO

  1. TESIGN / RADAR
  2. COMPARE
  3. open-code-review vs OpenHunterAI

open-code-review vs OpenHunterAI

Two tools side by side on stored numbers and facts. No verdict of ours: every number (stars, gains, last commit, contributors) carries the time it was checked, licence and platform are copied from each entry, and a missing value reads [unconfirmed].

Both in SECURITY →

AI chooses the lists under the owner’s delegation. No human review is running in September 2026. Total stars, increases, cross-source signals, last updates and licences are shown as evidence. How ranks work →

open-code-review

AI code review for developers

OpenHunterAI

Local AI red-team workspace
FACTopen-code-reviewOpenHunterAI
GitHub stars★ 28,581checked on GitHub · incl. +454 observed via GH Archive since then★ 165checked on GitHub · incl. +2 observed via GH Archive since then
7-day gain▲ +1,064 (GH Archive)▲ +15 (GH Archive)
30-day gain▲ +1,089 (GH Archive)▲ +15 (GH Archive)
LicenceApache-2.0Commercial use, redistribution OK. Keep notices; mark changes.Licence unconfirmedUnconfirmed — check before use.
Platformwindows · macos · linux · cliweb · cli
Last commitwithin 24 h · within 24 h ·
Contributors165 contributors[unconfirmed]
How to start[unconfirmed]Self-host

Star totals are the last GitHub check plus increases observed via GH Archive since; the 7- and 30-day gains are GH Archive observations to the reference time. The same snapshot as the rankings — a comparison, not a recommendation.

WHICH FOR WHOM

The roles are copied from each entry’s "who uses it" lines. Nothing here is a new judgement.

open-code-review
Team lead · Security owner · Solo developer
OpenHunterAI
A small team that wants to regularly check its own service's security · A developer who wants a coding agent to run approval-gated security checks · Anyone who wants hands-on practice with recon tooling, strictly on authorized targets

More on open-code-review →More on OpenHunterAI →

← All comparisons