- TESIGN / RADAR
- COMPARE
- liarjs vs OpenHunterAI
liarjs vs OpenHunterAI
Two tools side by side on stored numbers and facts. No verdict of ours: every number (stars, gains, last commit, contributors) carries the time it was checked, licence and platform are copied from each entry, and a missing value reads [unconfirmed].
AI chooses the lists under the owner’s delegation. No human review is running in September 2026. Total stars, increases, cross-source signals, last updates and licences are shown as evidence. How ranks work →
liarjs
Check where a browser contradicts itselfOpenHunterAI
Local AI red-team workspace| FACT | liarjs | OpenHunterAI |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 214checked on GitHub · incl. +3 observed via GH Archive since then | ★ 306checked on GitHub |
| 7-day gain | ▲ +21 (GH Archive) | ▲ +15 (GH Archive) |
| 30-day gain | ▲ +21 (GH Archive) | ▲ +15 (GH Archive) |
| Licence | MITUse, change and redistribute, commercially too. Keep the notice. | Licence unconfirmedUnconfirmed — check before use. |
| Platform | web · cli | web · cli |
| Last commit | 26 days ago · | 3 days ago · |
| Contributors | [unconfirmed] | 4 contributors |
| How to start | Use in the browser | Self-host |
Star totals are the last GitHub check plus increases observed via GH Archive since; the 7- and 30-day gains are GH Archive observations to the reference time. The same snapshot as the rankings — a comparison, not a recommendation.
WHICH FOR WHOM
The roles are copied from each entry’s "who uses it" lines. Nothing here is a new judgement.
- liarjs
- People checking whether their privacy settings actually hold, and developers working on bot detection or traffic analysis.
- OpenHunterAI
- A small team that wants to regularly check its own service's security · A developer who wants a coding agent to run approval-gated security checks · Anyone who wants hands-on practice with recon tooling, strictly on authorized targets