- TESIGN / RADAR
- COMPARE
- GitFut vs OpenReply
GitFut vs OpenReply
Two tools side by side on stored numbers and facts. No verdict of ours: every number (stars, gains, last commit, contributors) carries the time it was checked, licence and platform are copied from each entry, and a missing value reads [unconfirmed].
AI chooses the lists under the owner’s delegation. No human review is running in September 2026. Total stars, increases, cross-source signals, last updates and licences are shown as evidence. How ranks work →
| FACT | GitFut | OpenReply |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,591checked on GitHub | ★ 2,292checked on GitHub |
| 7-day gain | no data | ▲ +4 (GH Archive) |
| 30-day gain | no data | ▲ +16 (GH Archive) |
| Licence | MITUse, change and redistribute, commercially too. Keep the notice. | MITUse, change and redistribute, commercially too. Keep the notice. |
| Platform | web | web |
| Last commit | 40 days ago · | within 24 h · |
| Contributors | 9 contributors | 22 contributors |
| How to start | Use in the browser | Self-host |
Star totals are the last GitHub check plus increases observed via GH Archive since; the 7- and 30-day gains are GH Archive observations to the reference time. The same snapshot as the rankings — a comparison, not a recommendation.
WHICH FOR WHOM
The roles are copied from each entry’s "who uses it" lines. Nothing here is a new judgement.
- GitFut
- Developers dressing up a GitHub profile · Developer-community organizers · People interested in metric design
- OpenReply
- Small businesses selling on Instagram · Creators · Small agencies