TESIGN
SAVED

EN · KO

Auto-generated — not yet edited · only the numbers are verified

  1. TESIGN / RADAR
  2. REPOSITORY CARD
  3. jordan-gibbs/hyperresearch

jordan-gibbs/hyperresearch

Agent-driven research knowledge base. Agents collect, search, and synthesize web research into a persistent, searchable wiki.

★ 3.1k▲ +285 / 7dDaily star increases over 14 days. Hollow bars mean no data. The last day may be partial.2026-09-03 no data2026-09-04 no data2026-09-05 +22026-09-06 no data2026-09-07 no data2026-09-08 no data2026-09-09 no data2026-09-10 +122026-09-11 +1182026-09-12 +1192026-09-13 +342026-09-14 +22026-09-15 no data2026-09-16 no datalargest one-day increase in the 14 days+119last 14 days · stars per dayhollow = no data

RANKS Rising 7d #33 · Rising 30d #70

AT A GLANCE

LANGUAGE
Python
LICENSE
MIT
USAGE
Use, change and redistribute, commercially too. Keep the notice.
ACTIVITY
last commit 4 days ago ()
TOPICS
  • agents
  • agentskills
  • claude-code
  • deep-research
  • deep-research-agent
HOMEPAGE
https://hyperresearch.ai
REPOSITORY
GitHub ↗
CATEGORY
AI

A summary, not legal advice.

README EXCERPT

The Most Powerful Deep Research Harness --- Hyperresearch turns Claude Code into a deep research agent: one that currently leads the DeepResearch-Bench RACE leaderboard (benchmarked internally). A tier-adaptive 16-step pipeline takes one prompt and produces an adversarially-audited report with full source provenance. Every source it reads lands in a persistent, searchable vault, so each session starts smarter than the last. Forward-looking projection from a stratified pilot against the DeepResearch-Bench leaderboard snapshot (https://huggingface.co/spaces/muset-ai/DeepResearch-Bench-Leaderboard). Third party validation is pending. Why it wins - 250+ sources in a single run. The premier scale profile targets 100–130 in the width sweep alone; citation chasing and gap-fill fetches more than double what actually lands in the corpus. - Every citation is verified before the report ships. A skeptical cite-checker audits whether each cited source actually supports its sentence. Hallucinated quotes and unacknowledged retractions are hard blocks at the gate. - Syndication doesn't count as consensus. An independence audit clusters derivative copies, so five reprints of one press release argue…

The opening of the GitHub README as stored, at most 1,200 characters. Markdown is not rendered.

TIMELINE

  1. Repository created
  2. Last push
  3. FIRST SEEN BY TESIGN

AI chooses the lists under the owner’s delegation. No human review is running in September 2026. Total stars, increases, cross-source signals, last updates and licences are shown as evidence. How ranks work →

If this repository gets editorial text (why, build, who, start, caveat) it becomes an edited entry. Until then the page shows only stored GitHub metadata and numbers.