Auto-generated — not yet edited · only the numbers are verified
- TESIGN / RADAR
- REPOSITORY CARD
- dragonflydb/dragonfly
dragonflydb/dragonfly
A modern replacement for Redis and Memcached
RANKS All-time #229
AT A GLANCE
- LANGUAGE
- C++
- LICENSE
- Licence unconfirmed
- USAGE
- Unconfirmed — check before use.
- ACTIVITY
- last commit 3 days ago ()
- TOPICS
- cache
- cpp
- database
- fibers
- in-memory
- in-memory-database
- key-value
- keydb
- memcached
- message-broker
- multi-threading
- nosql
- HOMEPAGE
- https://www.dragonflydb.io/
- REPOSITORY
- GitHub ↗
- CATEGORY
- AI
A summary, not legal advice.
README EXCERPT
Before moving on, please consider giving us a GitHub star ⭐️. Thank you! Other languages: 简体中文 日本語 한국어 Português ภาษาไทย Website • Docs • Quick Start • Community Discord • Dragonfly User Conference • Join the Dragonfly Community GitHub Discussions • GitHub Issues • Contributing • AI Agents Guide • Dragonfly Cloud The world's most efficient in-memory data store Dragonfly is an in-memory data store built for modern application workloads. Fully compatible with Redis and Memcached APIs, Dragonfly requires no code changes to adopt. Compared to legacy in-memory datastores, Dragonfly delivers 25X more throughput, higher cache hit rates with lower tail latency, and can run on up to 80% less resources for the same sized workload. Contents - Benchmarks - Quick start - Configuration - Design decisions - Background - Build from source - Contributors Benchmarks We first compare Dragonfly with Redis on m5.large instance which is commonly used to run Redis due to its single-threaded architecture. The benchmark program runs from another load-test instance (c5n) in the same AZ using memtier benchmark -c 20 --test-time 100 -t 4 -d 256 --distinct-client-seed Dragonfly shows a comparable performance:…
The opening of the GitHub README as stored, at most 1,200 characters. Markdown is not rendered.
TIMELINE
- Repository created
- Last push
- FIRST SEEN BY TESIGN ◌ BACK CATALOG
AI chooses the lists under the owner’s delegation. No human review is running in September 2026. Total stars, increases, cross-source signals, last updates and licences are shown as evidence. How ranks work →
If this repository gets editorial text (why, build, who, start, caveat) it becomes an edited entry. Until then the page shows only stored GitHub metadata and numbers.