- TESIGN / RADAR
- COMPARE
- peerd vs quickgui
peerd vs quickgui
Two tools side by side on stored numbers and facts. No verdict of ours: every number (stars, gains, last commit, contributors) carries the time it was checked, licence and platform are copied from each entry, and a missing value reads [unconfirmed].
AI chooses the lists under the owner’s delegation. No human review is running in September 2026. Total stars, increases, cross-source signals, last updates and licences are shown as evidence. How ranks work →
| FACT | peerd | quickgui |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 408checked on GitHub | ★ 424checked on GitHub |
| 7-day gain | no data | ▲ +58 (GH Archive) |
| 30-day gain | no data | ▲ +58 (GH Archive) |
| Licence | Apache-2.0Commercial use, redistribution OK. Keep notices; mark changes. | Licence unconfirmedUnconfirmed — check before use. |
| Platform | web | macos |
| Last commit | within 24 h · | within 24 h · |
| Contributors | 8 contributors | 2 contributors |
| How to start | Install to use | [unconfirmed] |
Star totals are the last GitHub check plus increases observed via GH Archive since; the 7- and 30-day gains are GH Archive observations to the reference time. The same snapshot as the rankings — a comparison, not a recommendation.
WHICH FOR WHOM
The roles are copied from each entry’s "who uses it" lines. Nothing here is a new judgement.
- peerd
- Individuals automating browser work · Developers interested in agent security · People who want to try agents without a backend
- quickgui
- Desktop developer · Go/Rust developer