TESIGN
SAVED

EN · KO

  1. TESIGN / RADAR
  2. COMPARE
  3. OpenReply vs ZapFast

OpenReply vs ZapFast

Two tools side by side on stored numbers and facts. No verdict of ours: every number (stars, gains, last commit, contributors) carries the time it was checked, licence and platform are copied from each entry, and a missing value reads [unconfirmed].

Both in SOCIAL →

AI chooses the lists under the owner’s delegation. No human review is running in September 2026. Total stars, increases, cross-source signals, last updates and licences are shown as evidence. How ranks work →

OpenReply

Instagram comment-to-DM automation

ZapFast

Lightweight native WhatsApp client
FACTOpenReplyZapFast
GitHub stars★ 2,292checked on GitHub ★ 107checked on GitHub · incl. +11 observed via GH Archive since then
7-day gain▲ +4 (GH Archive)▲ +39 (GH Archive)
30-day gain▲ +16 (GH Archive)▲ +39 (GH Archive)
LicenceMITUse, change and redistribute, commercially too. Keep the notice.MITUse, change and redistribute, commercially too. Keep the notice.
Platformwebmacos · windows · linux
Last commitwithin 24 h · within 24 h ·
Contributors22 contributors[unconfirmed]
How to startSelf-hostInstall to use

Star totals are the last GitHub check plus increases observed via GH Archive since; the 7- and 30-day gains are GH Archive observations to the reference time. The same snapshot as the rankings — a comparison, not a recommendation.

WHICH FOR WHOM

The roles are copied from each entry’s "who uses it" lines. Nothing here is a new judgement.

OpenReply
Small businesses selling on Instagram · Creators · Small agencies
ZapFast
Anyone who keeps WhatsApp open all day and wants it to use less memory · Someone on an older or low-power laptop where Chromium-based apps drag · Linux or Windows users who want a native feel where there's no official app

More on OpenReply →More on ZapFast →

← All comparisons