- TESIGN / RADAR
- COMPARE
- MVT vs open-code-review
MVT vs open-code-review
Two tools side by side on stored numbers and facts. No verdict of ours: every number (stars, gains, last commit, contributors) carries the time it was checked, licence and platform are copied from each entry, and a missing value reads [unconfirmed].
AI chooses the lists under the owner’s delegation. No human review is running in September 2026. Total stars, increases, cross-source signals, last updates and licences are shown as evidence. How ranks work →
MVT
Check your phone for spyware tracesopen-code-review
AI code review for developers| FACT | MVT | open-code-review |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 15,676checked on GitHub | ★ 49,245checked on GitHub |
| 7-day gain | no data | no data |
| 30-day gain | no data | no data |
| Licence | Licence unconfirmedUnconfirmed — check before use. | Apache-2.0Commercial use, redistribution OK. Keep notices; mark changes. |
| Platform | cli · macos · linux | windows · macos · linux · cli |
| Last commit | 3 days ago · | within 24 h · |
| Contributors | 88 contributors | 204 contributors |
| How to start | Install to use | [unconfirmed] |
Star totals are the last GitHub check plus increases observed via GH Archive since; the 7- and 30-day gains are GH Archive observations to the reference time. The same snapshot as the rankings — a comparison, not a recommendation.
WHICH FOR WHOM
The roles are copied from each entry’s "who uses it" lines. Nothing here is a new judgement.
- MVT
- Activists, journalists and researchers who suspect they may be a target, and technically comfortable users who want to check their own phone.
- open-code-review
- Team lead · Security owner · Solo developer