- TESIGN / RADAR
- COMPARE
- humanizer vs Recordly
humanizer vs Recordly
Two tools side by side on stored numbers and facts. No verdict of ours: every number (stars, gains, last commit, contributors) carries the time it was checked, licence and platform are copied from each entry, and a missing value reads [unconfirmed].
AI chooses the lists under the owner’s delegation. No human review is running in September 2026. Total stars, increases, cross-source signals, last updates and licences are shown as evidence. How ranks work →
| FACT | humanizer | Recordly |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 48,604checked on GitHub · incl. +104 observed via GH Archive since then | ★ 29,045checked on GitHub · incl. +24 observed via GH Archive since then |
| 7-day gain | ▲ +456 (GH Archive) | ▲ +399 (GH Archive) |
| 30-day gain | ▲ +1,546 (GH Archive) | ▲ +641 (GH Archive) |
| Licence | MITUse, change and redistribute, commercially too. Keep the notice. | Licence unconfirmedUnconfirmed — check before use. |
| Platform | [unconfirmed] | macos · windows · linux |
| Last commit | 8 days ago · | within 24 h · |
| Contributors | 19 contributors | 76 contributors |
| How to start | For developers | Install to use |
Star totals are the last GitHub check plus increases observed via GH Archive since; the 7- and 30-day gains are GH Archive observations to the reference time. The same snapshot as the rankings — a comparison, not a recommendation.
WHICH FOR WHOM
The roles are copied from each entry’s "who uses it" lines. Nothing here is a new judgement.
- humanizer
- Marketer · Blogger · Docs writer
- Recordly
- Product owner · Support agent · Solo developer