- TESIGN / RADAR
- COMPARE
- ecc vs open-code-review
ecc vs open-code-review
Two tools side by side on stored numbers and facts. No verdict of ours: every number (stars, gains, last commit, contributors) carries the time it was checked, licence and platform are copied from each entry, and a missing value reads [unconfirmed].
AI chooses the lists under the owner’s delegation. No human review is running in September 2026. Total stars, increases, cross-source signals, last updates and licences are shown as evidence. How ranks work →
ecc
Skills, memory and security for agentsopen-code-review
AI code review for developers| FACT | ecc | open-code-review |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 259,284checked on GitHub · incl. +152 observed via GH Archive since then | ★ 28,581checked on GitHub · incl. +454 observed via GH Archive since then |
| 7-day gain | ▲ +832 (GH Archive) | ▲ +1,064 (GH Archive) |
| 30-day gain | ▲ +2,660 (GH Archive) | ▲ +1,089 (GH Archive) |
| Licence | MITUse, change and redistribute, commercially too. Keep the notice. | Apache-2.0Commercial use, redistribution OK. Keep notices; mark changes. |
| Platform | windows · macos · linux · cli | windows · macos · linux · cli |
| Last commit | within 24 h · | within 24 h · |
| Contributors | 359 contributors | 165 contributors |
| How to start | For developers | [unconfirmed] |
Star totals are the last GitHub check plus increases observed via GH Archive since; the 7- and 30-day gains are GH Archive observations to the reference time. The same snapshot as the rankings — a comparison, not a recommendation.
WHICH FOR WHOM
The roles are copied from each entry’s "who uses it" lines. Nothing here is a new judgement.
- ecc
- Team lead · Developer
- open-code-review
- Team lead · Security owner · Solo developer