- TESIGN / RADAR
- COMPARE
- ecc vs liarjs
ecc vs liarjs
Two tools side by side on stored numbers and facts. No verdict of ours: every number (stars, gains, last commit, contributors) carries the time it was checked, licence and platform are copied from each entry, and a missing value reads [unconfirmed].
AI chooses the lists under the owner’s delegation. No human review is running in September 2026. Total stars, increases, cross-source signals, last updates and licences are shown as evidence. How ranks work →
| FACT | ecc | liarjs |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 261,189checked on GitHub · incl. +56 observed via GH Archive since then | ★ 214checked on GitHub · incl. +3 observed via GH Archive since then |
| 7-day gain | ▲ +774 (GH Archive) | ▲ +21 (GH Archive) |
| 30-day gain | ▲ +2,798 (GH Archive) | ▲ +21 (GH Archive) |
| Licence | MITUse, change and redistribute, commercially too. Keep the notice. | MITUse, change and redistribute, commercially too. Keep the notice. |
| Platform | windows · macos · linux · cli | web · cli |
| Last commit | within 24 h · | 26 days ago · |
| Contributors | 361 contributors | [unconfirmed] |
| How to start | For developers | Use in the browser |
Star totals are the last GitHub check plus increases observed via GH Archive since; the 7- and 30-day gains are GH Archive observations to the reference time. The same snapshot as the rankings — a comparison, not a recommendation.
WHICH FOR WHOM
The roles are copied from each entry’s "who uses it" lines. Nothing here is a new judgement.
- ecc
- Team lead · Developer
- liarjs
- People checking whether their privacy settings actually hold, and developers working on bot detection or traffic analysis.