- TESIGN / RADAR
- COMPARE
- Easel vs OpenReply
Easel vs OpenReply
Two tools side by side on stored numbers and facts. No verdict of ours: every number (stars, gains, last commit, contributors) carries the time it was checked, licence and platform are copied from each entry, and a missing value reads [unconfirmed].
AI chooses the lists under the owner’s delegation. No human review is running in September 2026. Total stars, increases, cross-source signals, last updates and licences are shown as evidence. How ranks work →
| FACT | Easel | OpenReply |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,129checked on GitHub | ★ 2,292checked on GitHub |
| 7-day gain | ▲ +48 (GH Archive) | ▲ +4 (GH Archive) |
| 30-day gain | ▲ +66 (GH Archive) | ▲ +16 (GH Archive) |
| Licence | Apache-2.0Commercial use, redistribution OK. Keep notices; mark changes. | MITUse, change and redistribute, commercially too. Keep the notice. |
| Platform | web · linux · macos · windows | web |
| Last commit | within 24 h · | within 24 h · |
| Contributors | 9 contributors | 22 contributors |
| How to start | Install to use | Self-host |
Star totals are the last GitHub check plus increases observed via GH Archive since; the 7- and 30-day gains are GH Archive observations to the reference time. The same snapshot as the rankings — a comparison, not a recommendation.
WHICH FOR WHOM
The roles are copied from each entry’s "who uses it" lines. Nothing here is a new judgement.
- Easel
- China-platform operators · Labs and education channels · Agent developers
- OpenReply
- Small businesses selling on Instagram · Creators · Small agencies