- TESIGN / RADAR
- COMPARE
- DeepSeek Harness vs open-code-review
DeepSeek Harness vs open-code-review
Two tools side by side on stored numbers and facts. No verdict of ours: every number (stars, gains, last commit, contributors) carries the time it was checked, licence and platform are copied from each entry, and a missing value reads [unconfirmed].
AI chooses the lists under the owner’s delegation. No human review is running in September 2026. Total stars, increases, cross-source signals, last updates and licences are shown as evidence. How ranks work →
DeepSeek Harness
Plugin agent harness for developersopen-code-review
AI code review for developers| FACT | DeepSeek Harness | open-code-review |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 268,437checked on GitHub | ★ 49,245checked on GitHub |
| 7-day gain | ▲ +61 (GH Archive) | no data |
| 30-day gain | ▲ +61 (GH Archive) | no data |
| Licence | MITUse, change and redistribute, commercially too. Keep the notice. | Apache-2.0Commercial use, redistribution OK. Keep notices; mark changes. |
| Platform | web · cli | windows · macos · linux · cli |
| Last commit | 2 days ago · | within 24 h · |
| Contributors | 66 contributors | 204 contributors |
| How to start | Install to use | [unconfirmed] |
Star totals are the last GitHub check plus increases observed via GH Archive since; the 7- and 30-day gains are GH Archive observations to the reference time. The same snapshot as the rankings — a comparison, not a recommendation.
WHICH FOR WHOM
The roles are copied from each entry’s "who uses it" lines. Nothing here is a new judgement.
- DeepSeek Harness
- Agent developer · Platform engineer
- open-code-review
- Team lead · Security owner · Solo developer