TESIGN
SAVED

EN · KO

  1. TESIGN / RADAR
  2. COMPARE
  3. DeepSeek Harness vs open-code-review

DeepSeek Harness vs open-code-review

Two tools side by side on stored numbers and facts. No verdict of ours: every number (stars, gains, last commit, contributors) carries the time it was checked, licence and platform are copied from each entry, and a missing value reads [unconfirmed].

Both in DEV TOOLS →

AI chooses the lists under the owner’s delegation. No human review is running in September 2026. Total stars, increases, cross-source signals, last updates and licences are shown as evidence. How ranks work →

DeepSeek Harness

Plugin agent harness for developers

open-code-review

AI code review for developers
FACTDeepSeek Harnessopen-code-review
GitHub stars★ 225,421checked on GitHub · incl. +162 observed via GH Archive since then★ 28,581checked on GitHub · incl. +454 observed via GH Archive since then
7-day gain▲ +1,356 (GH Archive)▲ +1,064 (GH Archive)
30-day gain▲ +2,928 (GH Archive)▲ +1,089 (GH Archive)
LicenceMITUse, change and redistribute, commercially too. Keep the notice.Apache-2.0Commercial use, redistribution OK. Keep notices; mark changes.
Platformweb · cliwindows · macos · linux · cli
Last commitwithin 24 h · within 24 h ·
Contributors45 contributors165 contributors
How to startInstall to use[unconfirmed]

Star totals are the last GitHub check plus increases observed via GH Archive since; the 7- and 30-day gains are GH Archive observations to the reference time. The same snapshot as the rankings — a comparison, not a recommendation.

WHICH FOR WHOM

The roles are copied from each entry’s "who uses it" lines. Nothing here is a new judgement.

DeepSeek Harness
Agent developer · Platform engineer
open-code-review
Team lead · Security owner · Solo developer

More on DeepSeek Harness →More on open-code-review →

← All comparisons