- TESIGN / RADAR
- COMPARE
- Coder vs HypoMux
Coder vs HypoMux
Two tools side by side on stored numbers and facts. No verdict of ours: every number (stars, gains, last commit, contributors) carries the time it was checked, licence and platform are copied from each entry, and a missing value reads [unconfirmed].
AI chooses the lists under the owner’s delegation. No human review is running in September 2026. Total stars, increases, cross-source signals, last updates and licences are shown as evidence. How ranks work →
| FACT | Coder | HypoMux |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,815checked on GitHub · incl. +11 observed via GH Archive since then | ★ 3,550checked on GitHub |
| 7-day gain | ▲ +31 (GH Archive) | ▲ +2 (GH Archive) |
| 30-day gain | ▲ +37 (GH Archive) | ▲ +11 (GH Archive) |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0Release source if you redistribute or host it as a service. | AGPL-3.0Release source if you redistribute or host it as a service. |
| Platform | web · linux | windows |
| Last commit | within 24 h · | within 24 h · |
| Contributors | [unconfirmed] | 7 contributors |
| How to start | Self-host | Install to use |
Star totals are the last GitHub check plus increases observed via GH Archive since; the 7- and 30-day gains are GH Archive observations to the reference time. The same snapshot as the rankings — a comparison, not a recommendation.
WHICH FOR WHOM
The roles are copied from each entry’s "who uses it" lines. Nothing here is a new judgement.
- Coder
- Teams with several developers, projects with rotating contractors, and organisations that cannot let code sit on personal laptops.
- HypoMux
- Windows gamers with two or more links · IDM and other multi-threaded downloader users · Windows networking developers