- TESIGN / RADAR
- COMPARE
- archify vs DeepSeek Harness
archify vs DeepSeek Harness
Two tools side by side on stored numbers and facts. No verdict of ours: every number (stars, gains, last commit, contributors) carries the time it was checked, licence and platform are copied from each entry, and a missing value reads [unconfirmed].
AI chooses the lists under the owner’s delegation. No human review is running in September 2026. Total stars, increases, cross-source signals, last updates and licences are shown as evidence. How ranks work →
archify
System diagrams for coding-agent usersDeepSeek Harness
Plugin agent harness for developers| FACT | archify | DeepSeek Harness |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 63,560checked on GitHub · incl. +205 observed via GH Archive since then | ★ 225,421checked on GitHub · incl. +162 observed via GH Archive since then |
| 7-day gain | ▲ +1,307 (GH Archive) | ▲ +1,356 (GH Archive) |
| 30-day gain | ▲ +3,596 (GH Archive) | ▲ +2,928 (GH Archive) |
| Licence | MITUse, change and redistribute, commercially too. Keep the notice. | MITUse, change and redistribute, commercially too. Keep the notice. |
| Platform | [unconfirmed] | web · cli |
| Last commit | within 24 h · | within 24 h · |
| Contributors | 29 contributors | 45 contributors |
| How to start | For developers | Install to use |
Star totals are the last GitHub check plus increases observed via GH Archive since; the 7- and 30-day gains are GH Archive observations to the reference time. The same snapshot as the rankings — a comparison, not a recommendation.
WHICH FOR WHOM
The roles are copied from each entry’s "who uses it" lines. Nothing here is a new judgement.
- archify
- Backend developer · Tech consultant · Tech lead
- DeepSeek Harness
- Agent developer · Platform engineer